The abstract is 125 words or less and presents a concise picture of the proposed research. It includes major constructs and hypotheses. The abstract is the first section of the paper.[8]
Actions that are implemented to achieve the desired program results.
A research strategy that investigates a phenomenon in its natural setting using mulitple sources of evidence. [10]
A group of people that do not receive the program under investigation and are compared to the group of program recipients on measures of interest. Comparison group differs from control groups in that they are not selected randomly from the same population as program participants. [10]
A group chosen randomly from the same population as the program group but that does not receive the program. It is a stand-in for what the program group would have looked like if it had not received the program. [10]
Nonrandom sampling in which the sample is drawn from the target population because of ease of access. [10]
A measure of the presumed effect in a study. Its values are predicted by other variables, called independent variables.[10]
Values that describe the characteristics of a sample or population. [7]
The systematic assessment of the operation and/or outcomes of a program or policy, compared to explicit or implicit standards, in order to contribute to the improvement of the program or policy. [10]
Evaluation designs in which potential recipients are randomly assigned to either a "treatment" group (receive the evaluand) or a "control" group (receive either nothing or an alternative intervention). [2]
Describes a research project or evaluation initiative. Fact sheets often contain technical data lists and statistics or are sometimes a summary of a much longer document.
A small panel of persons selected for their knowledge or perspective on a topic of interest that is convened to discuss the topic with the assistance of a facilitator. The discussion is used to identify important themes or to construct descriptive summaries of views and experiences on the focal topic. [6]
A type of evaluation conducted during the course of program implementation whose primary purpose is to provide information to improve the program under study. [10]
Change or (sometimes) lack of change caused by the evaluand. This term is similar in meaning to the terms outcome and effect. The term impact is often used to refer to long-term outcomes. [2]
The presumed cause of some outcome under study; changes in an independent variable are expected to predict a change in the value of a dependent variable. [10]
Statistical analysis used to reach conclusions that extend beyond the immediate data alone. [8]
The resources used to conduct a program. [10]
A review board that evaluates, approves, and monitors all research projects with respect to ethical requirements and practices. [1]
A data collection method in which participants provide information about their behavior, thoughts, or feelings in response to questions posed by an interviewer. [1]
Logic models are visual representations of programs that show how a program is intended to work, that is, how resources that are available to deliver the program are converted into program activities, and how those activities in turn produce intended results. [5]
A study design in which data are collected at several points in time from the same individuals, groups, or organizations. [10]
The use of multiple measures, which include a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches. [3]
An evaluative study that answers questions about the social conditions a program is intended to address and the need for the program. [6]
A data collection method in which the researcher watches and records events and processes. [10]
The end results of the program. Outcomes may be intended or unintended and be positive or negative. [10]
A study of whether or not the program produced the intended program effects. Outcome evaluation relates to the phase of the program studied in this case, the end result of the program. [10]
A measure taken after a program ends. [10]
A measure taken before a program ends. [10]
A reflexive control design in which only one measure is taken before and after the intervention. [6]
A form of program evaluation designed to determine whether the program is delivered as intended to the target recipients. Also known as implementation assessment. [6]
Data that examines phenomena primarily through words and tends to focus on dynamics, meaning and context. [10]
Data that examines phenomena that can be expressed numerically and analyzed statistically. [10]
A class of research designs in which program (or treatment) and comparison groups are selected non randomly but in which some controls are introduced to minimize threats to the validity of conclusions. [10]
A group of written questions to which subjects respond. Some restrict the use of the term "questionnaire" to written responses. [7]
Assignment of potential targets to intervention and control groups on the basis of chance so that every unit in a target population has the same probability as any other to be selected for either group. Also referred to as randomization. [6]
The consistency or stability of a measure over repeated use. An instrument is said to be reliable if repeated efforts to measure the same phenomenon produce the same result. [10]
The act of selecting units from a population. [10]
A source that provides non-original (secondhand) data or information. [9]
A nonprobability sampling method in which each person interviewed is asked to suggest additional knowledgeable people for interviewing. [6]
Individuals who conduct, participate in, fund, or manage a program, or who may otherwise affect or be affected by decisions about the program or evaluation. [10]
A study conducted at the end of a program (or of a phase of the program) to determine the extent to which anticipated outcomes were produced. Summative evaluation is intended to provide information about the worth of the program. [10]
A sample drawn by selecting every Nth case from a list of potential units. [10]
Designs that collect data over long time intervals. In evaluation, time-series designs take repeated measurements of key variables at periodic intervals before, during, and after program implementation and analyze changes over time. [10]
The extent to which a measure actually measures what it is intended to measure. [6]
A measured characteristic, usually expressed quantitatively, that varies across members of a population. [10]
Click here for a list of citations used to create this glossary.